Two legal decisions were made at two supreme courts in two separate countries in recent weeks that will surely go down in legal history for a number of reasons, not least of which is the stunning parallels and differences between them. Both of the cases involved a dispute between the LGBTQ+ community and a privately owned religious business. Both of the cases resulted in a 7-2 decision.
And yet both of the cases resulted in completely divergent conclusions. In America freedom of conscience prevailed, and in Canada freedom of conscience was sacrificed.
Continue reading “The Supreme Court of Canada strikes (out) again”
Some interesting stuff for your reading pleasure…
Continue reading “Interesting stuff – 2017-10-24”
Boy, I’ve been tardy lately. Lot’s going on. Hopefully I’ll get back into the swing of things in the coming weeks.
Here’s some interesting stuff for you to consider.
Continue reading “Interesting stuff 2017-06-19”
Ok, so the start of the year was very slow for blogging. I’m always looking for the right balance; bear with me.
Here’s some stuff I found interesting recently.
Continue reading “Interesting Stuff – 2017-04-03”
What do bathroom bills in the states, Jordan Peterson, Jason Kenney and Brad Trost all have in common? They embrace, or are at least open to, socially conservative views. And they are expressing those views. Publicly.
And they are being slammed for it by liberals, the media and social media. And they don’t care. And they won’t back down.
Continue reading “Social Conservatives in politics – a new wind blows”
Some interesting stuff I read recently…
Continue reading “Interesting stuff”
Along the lines of my previous commitment to blog less, I intend to also keep my comments on “interesting stuff” to more of a minimum. I hope. I have this awful habit of rambling…
Continue reading “Interesting stuff – 2017-01-12”
The National Post published an opinion piece about Parliament’s decision to investigate the impact of violent porn on children, women and men. The opinion piece was highly critical of this decision as utterly pointless based on the “evidence” of science.
The author appears to have assumed that readers would not engage in one very simple act that would cast serious doubt on her entire perspective. The simple act of clicking on the links she provided.
Continue reading “porn, media, and doing your own homework”
The interesting stuff just keeps pouring in (in part thanks to inputs from readers).
Continue reading “Interesting stuff 2016-12-12”